Is support for Panasonic DC-S1 / DC-S1R series planned?
In the source ('dcraw.c') code i see that the new encoding is already recognized ('pana_encoding=6'), but is has not been implemented yet ('panasonic_load_raw()')
If someone has a description of the new format I can implement this myself. Or has Panasonic something like a developer support who can be asked?
I have seen that you already had seen the RawSpeed issue, but I thought that it would be a good idea to at the request here to, so it doesn't get lost.
Aligned buffers can be beneficial for usage with SSE and AVX instructions. Talking of course about all the image color data: ushort (*image)[4], and everything in: libraw_rawdata_t.
Can these be aligned per scanline (at least for the raw unprocessed data)?
I was wondering how much of metadata can be extracted using Libraw. I looked all over the site and couldn't find that information. I mean is there a list of exif tags that can be extracted?
With current LibRaw, custom IOs can be implemented by subclassing
LibRaw_abstract_datastream. But this is only available with the C++ API, the
C API only alows to open_file() or open_buffer(). In order to give the C API
more flexibility regarding IOs, I've started working on a LibRaw_proxy_datastream
class that would do IOs by calling a simple set of C callbacks provided by caller.
Initial code is here:
Hi all!
I hope to be giving you a good news by telling you that I developed QtRaw, a Qt image plugin for raw images, using libraw.
In my blog post there's a link to the source code. http://blog.mardy.it/2012/12/qtraw-mi-dono-pro-natal.html
Hello, I'm developing a program that use DNG lib from adobe.
When I compile there is a little problem. I must rename the struct tiff_tag into file libraw_internal.h because the adobe library has another struct with the same name. There is only 4 instances of this name into file libraw_internal.h not necessary change into other files.
Is it a easy change, and I don't mind keep doing, but it's will possible to change the name of this struct for future revisions ?
Recent comments