Alex,
I debugged my code and actually looked at the rgb_cam values in memory and they are different between 0.20.0 and 0.20.2. You can check the values I have posted in my first post.
The google drive link above has the RAW file. You can confirm this at your end.
Alex,
I understand there is no "right" answer when rendering an RGB image from CFA data. The images in 0.20.0 and 0.20.2 look quite similar (no opinion on which is better, they both look good).
I wanted to confirm that the changed value in 0.20.2 was expected and not accidental because it matched the values from an older behaviour.
I cannot understand your question. You complained 0.20.0/raw-identify displays incorrect data for some color matrices. We fixed that in 0.20.1/0.20.2. What exactly is the problem?
Ok, so reducing quality is with libraw_set_demosaic(handler, LibRaw_interpolation_quality.LINEAR); ?
I tried it and its speeding up the process already a little bit.
Unfortunate I can't access the params-scruct from SharpLibRaw, its not implemented, so I'm not able to play with params.user_qual and/or use half-size.
Sorry, how? With what function?
All I need is the pixels, but for 100.000 photos, which takes ages now since libraw_dcraw_process() needs 5-7sec per photo.
I found the pixels now in data[]. Its an c#-marshaling issue, wish needs a few more steps.
I also realized, that libraw_dcraw_process(handler); takes quiet a lot of time, several seconds, depending on the image-size. Is is really necessary for libraw_dcraw_make_mem_image()? Or is there a faster way to get the image?
Note: on fresh enough macOS this command sequence may end with ...blabla...aclocal-1.15 missing
In that case you need to recreate ./configure script by using
autoreconf --install
To run that you'll need these software packages: autoconf, automake, libtool, pkg-config. You may install it using macports or homebrew, or just download source code and install (please note: autoconf 2.70 is not working for unknown reason, use version 2.69)
Alex,
I debugged my code and actually looked at the rgb_cam values in memory and they are different between 0.20.0 and 0.20.2. You can check the values I have posted in my first post.
The google drive link above has the RAW file. You can confirm this at your end.
Dinesh
The problem was in raw-identify printing code, not in data.
Alex,
I understand there is no "right" answer when rendering an RGB image from CFA data. The images in 0.20.0 and 0.20.2 look quite similar (no opinion on which is better, they both look good).
I wanted to confirm that the changed value in 0.20.2 was expected and not accidental because it matched the values from an older behaviour.
Regards,
Dinesh
I cannot understand your question. You complained 0.20.0/raw-identify displays incorrect data for some color matrices. We fixed that in 0.20.1/0.20.2. What exactly is the problem?
Alex,
I am upgrading to 0.20.2 and I noticed for this file, the rgb_cam value matches that of 0.19.5 instead of 0.20.0.
The raw-identify output on 0.20.2 has the following:
Camera2RGB matrix (mode: 1):
1.6374 -0.2528 -0.0035 -0.3811
0.0672 0.8224 -0.5306 0.6410
-0.0009 -0.3551 1.4153 -0.0593
which matches 0.19.5 (see comments above). Is this intentional?
Regards,
Dinesh
Sorry, know nothing about C# (both generally and specific wrapper you use)
Ok, so reducing quality is with libraw_set_demosaic(handler, LibRaw_interpolation_quality.LINEAR); ?
I tried it and its speeding up the process already a little bit.
Unfortunate I can't access the params-scruct from SharpLibRaw, its not implemented, so I'm not able to play with params.user_qual and/or use half-size.
Just to remember, I'm using c#
If so, you need raw to rgb interpolation that is performed by dcraw_process(). Reducing quality (or using half_mode) will speed-up things.
I need a rgb-pixmap.
And followup: what 'pixels' do you need? Original raw values, or processed RGB pixmap?
dcraw_process() parameters are adjusted via imgdata.params: https://www.libraw.org/docs/API-datastruct.html#libraw_output_params_t
Sorry, how? With what function?
All I need is the pixels, but for 100.000 photos, which takes ages now since libraw_dcraw_process() needs 5-7sec per photo.
One may adjust params.user_qual and/or use half-size interpolation.
Thanks Alex,
I found the pixels now in data[]. Its an c#-marshaling issue, wish needs a few more steps.
I also realized, that libraw_dcraw_process(handler); takes quiet a lot of time, several seconds, depending on the image-size. Is is really necessary for libraw_dcraw_make_mem_image()? Or is there a faster way to get the image?
This happens when pkg-config has not been installed when running autoreconf prior to executing configure script.
Followup: look into samples/mem_image_sample.cpp
Data is not empty,
your pixels are in data[0].....data[data_size-1]
glad to hear that my assistance helped.
Thanks Alex, with your detailed description I was able to compile the libraw.dylib and its working now with Xamarin.Mac,
Tom
The easiest way to create libraw.dylib is to run
Note: on fresh enough macOS this command sequence may end with ...blabla...aclocal-1.15 missing
In that case you need to recreate ./configure script by using
To run that you'll need these software packages: autoconf, automake, libtool, pkg-config. You may install it using macports or homebrew, or just download source code and install (please note: autoconf 2.70 is not working for unknown reason, use version 2.69)
Yes!
Will this be supported in the near future?
Thorsten
R5 uses new metadata format which is not supported by LibRaw 0.20.
We plan to support it in next public snapshot.
Do you have any plan to support brand new Sony A7C?
Thanks in advance.
/Yangsoo
Pages