Add new comment

I'm now using adjust_bl()

Submitted by David Partridge on

I'm now using adjust_bl() before doing my black level subtraction, and I'm seeing:

00000094 2019/06/24 14:33:18.354 018788 00002900             >Before adjust_bl() C.black = 0.
00000095 2019/06/24 14:33:18.363 018788 00002900             >First 10 C.cblack elements
00000095 2019/06/24 14:33:18.363 018788 00002900             >0, 0, 0, 0
00000095 2019/06/24 14:33:18.363 018788 00002900             >2, 2
00000095 2019/06/24 14:33:18.363 018788 00002900             >513, 513, 515, 516
00000096 2019/06/24 14:33:18.372 018788 00002900             >Subtracting black level of C.black = 513 from raw_image data.
00000097 2019/06/24 14:33:18.382 018788 00002900             >First 10 C.cblack elements
00000097 2019/06/24 14:33:18.382 018788 00002900             >516, 515, 513, 513
00000097 2019/06/24 14:33:18.382 018788 00002900             >0, 0
00000097 2019/06/24 14:33:18.382 018788 00002900             >513, 513, 515, 516

should I expect the order of cblack[0]-cblack[4] to be the reverse of cblack[7]-cblack[9]???

I'd have expected it to be in the same order as the levels reported by exiftool (513, 513, 515, 516)

David Partridge