Do you have a schedule for this?

Is it planned to support the Canon EOS R?

Is there a getter for libraw_internal_data.unpacker_data.fuji_layout or will I need to sub-class to get at that?

I found is_fuji_rotated() which returns libraw_internal_data.internal_output_params.fuji_width

Thanks

I couldn't locate the exact version I'm using in github (I'm using version 18.8) The code in question reads as follows:

    // Move saved bitmap to imgdata.image
    if( imgdata.idata.filters || P1.colors == 1)
      {
        if (IO.fuji_width) {
          unsigned r,c;
          int row,col;
          for (row=0; row < S.raw_height-S.top_margin*2; row++) {
            for (col=0; col < IO.fuji_width << !libraw_internal_data.unpacker_data.fuji_layout; col++) {
              if (libraw_internal_data.unpacker_data.fuji_layout) {
                r = IO.fuji_width - 1 - col + (row >> 1);
                c = col + ((row+1) >> 1);
              } else {
                r = IO.fuji_width - 1 + row - (col >> 1);
                c = row + ((col+1) >> 1);
              }
              if (r < S.height && c < S.width)
                imgdata.image[((r)>>IO.shrink)*S.iwidth+((c)>>IO.shrink)][FC(r,c)]
                  = imgdata.rawdata.raw_image[(row+S.top_margin)*S.raw_pitch/2+(col+S.left_margin)];
            }
          }
        }

I do not know what exact version you use. Could you please use github URLs with #l[lineno] markers in URL to point to exact version/exact line.

Please don't drop Fujitsu Super-CCD support, if that's done, people who use my software won't be able to reprocess old images (which the astrophotography folks often do).

I'll take a look at raw2image_ex() to see I can understand it.

Dave

AFAIK, this is vendor-specified value for white point.

For Canon cameras, imgdata.color.maximum is set by metadata provided by vendor in CR2 file.

Not doing so results in 'pink highlights' problem.

Thanks for your response!
Yes, I thought RawDigger used LibRaw.

I set no_auto_bright = 0, and it didn't really change the result. The LibRaw output is still much darker than the RawDigger output.

Are there any other settings I should be changing in LibRaw?

(Again, I suspect LibRaw is not using the DNG color matrix, but I'm not sure...)

Come on - you know what the word supported means as do I - after all you publish as list of supported cameras!

I am checking the libraw open_file() and unpack() return codes - what warning field are you referring to? I looked the possible values for imgdata.process_warnings but none of those suggest a "camera not supported" condition.

Looking at the errors that are potentially returned (apart from LIBRAW_FILE_UNSUPPORTED which might be returned for a Canon .CR3 file until you add that support), I still don't see anything to tell me a camera isn't supported.

Thanks

https://www.libraw.org/docs/API-datastruct.html#datastruct :
unsigned int process_warnings;