Ah, got it. Thanks for getting back to me. I've got a few follow-up questions:
1. Is there a list of cameras for which the matrices are known to be not particularly good so that we can work on improving them?
2. Would you accept a PR to update the matrix for the 6D to the values above?
3. When you say "standard data" -- what does that mean? Based on the comments in the code, my understanding was that the matrices were mostly extracted from DNGs, however it seems that the 6D values came from somewhere else?
For what it's worth, this particular matrix was pretty far off (it was mapping reds to a weird shade of almost orange); I don't know about the general case, but I do think it would be worthwhile to fix this matrix in particular.
Ah, got it. Thanks for getting back to me. I've got a few follow-up questions:
1. Is there a list of cameras for which the matrices are known to be not particularly good so that we can work on improving them?
2. Would you accept a PR to update the matrix for the 6D to the values above?
3. When you say "standard data" -- what does that mean? Based on the comments in the code, my understanding was that the matrices were mostly extracted from DNGs, however it seems that the 6D values came from somewhere else?
For what it's worth, this particular matrix was pretty far off (it was mapping reds to a weird shade of almost orange); I don't know about the general case, but I do think it would be worthwhile to fix this matrix in particular.
Thanks again,
James.